Skip to content Skip to footer

25/03/25 Summaries and relevant papers

25/03/25 Summaries and relevant papers

You are currently viewing a revision titled "25/03/25 Summaries and relevant papers", saved on April 21, 2026 at 11:20 pm by Tebo Kgosiemang
Title
25/03/25 Summaries and relevant papers
Content
  Shared summaries from various indigenous methods papers    POLOKO
  • Territorial embodies experiences
  • Co-creation of knowledge
  • Democratised communication of knowledge (language, media )
  • Shared decision thinking
  • Respectful negotiation
  • Subject of collective rights and not objects of the study
  • Rejects methodological neutrality
  • Interculturally in archeological interpretation
  SACKY (Lekgotla- Discussion)
  • Decolonized IK research method
  • Community engagement
  • Cultural sensitivity
  • 2 main pillars; shared understanding and
  • Position participants as co researchers and knowledge producers
  • Transformative participatory approach
  • Role of researcher ; not to facilitate
  • Epistemic authority distributed
  • Challenges and advocates for cultural research methodologies
  • Context-sensitive - challenges universalism
  • Immediacy, accessibility and collective ownership of knowledge
  DIEGO
  • moving beyond science and the production of knowldge
  • Participatory action research
  • not separating science from politics
  • separation of the two as a form of government control
  • challenges the criteria that only one scientist knows
  • PAC is unsidciplined can overcome the compartmetalisation of knowldge production
  • transformation of selves in the resreach process (Reflection could be a method) -body has feelings , reason
  • cultivation and nurturing of wisdom and knowledge (E>G social and insurgent cartography) tool,technique, method
  • strong rejection of scientific neutrality
  • relates situationally and territories
  • Author opens up more ideas on the purpose of resreach, from colonial to more ,beyond the experience-reason relationship
  • Commitment to transformation (racism  , sexism, classism, capitalism etc)
  • Criticism of extractives and encourages reciprocity
  Shati Decolonising research in a Sub-Saharan African context: exploring Ubuntu as a foundation for research methodology, ethics and agenda https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1432404  
  • Ubuntu
  • Ubuntu as a research paradigm
  • Decolonising research in SSA
  • Argues that research in the region should not rely on western knowledge
  • Rethink ethic and purpose of the research
  • Ubuntu as a holistic way of conceptualising research
  • Ubuntu is about interconnectedness and humanness and togetherness
  • Legitimate research method: that includes communities through participation
  • Community epistemologies are about strengthening connectedness
  • Ethical approach of respect and dignity; towards community; towards culture; towards individuals
  • Ethics and methodology cannot be separated
  • Ethics of the method matter in the approach
  • It is about relationality and interconnectedness between researcher and community
  • Take home message: you see yourself as part of the method; you are not a rigid object in the process; the way you interact and speak with the community needs to be in mind during the design of the research; participatory methods should be prioritised; community members are the owners of the knowledge you are collecting – not just subjects; challenges neutrality (you cannot be a neutral observer)
  Tebo Mkabela, Q. (2005). Using the Afrocentric method in researching indigenous African culture. The qualitative report, 10(1), 178-189. Penxa-Matholeni, N. (2023) ‘Storytelling as an indigenous research methodology.’ (Chapter 8) Moving methodologies. Doing practical and missional theology in an African context
  • Methodology is relational and participatory
  • Draws on PAR (participatory action research)
  • Afrocentric Method_ Using the Afrocentric method in resreach African culture
  • Both a paradigm and a method , guiding the entire resreach process to study IK authentically
  • AM emphasizes cultural centered (relevance, respectful and powerful)
  • Critiques studying African indigenous knowledge using western methods
  • Critiques Cartesian dualism (knowledge and intellectual dimensions not separte)
  • Intersubjectivity
  • Relationality between people placed in high regard
  • Critiques epistemic neutrality
  • Embraces positionality, cultural grounding and values
  • Epistemic violence erasing `African voices
  • Emphasizes Accessibility and resonance
  • Knowledge production through: oral traditions, story telling, proverbs and cultural practices and taboos.
  Next steps   Next meeting April 29, 2026 4:00 pm Botswana time  
Excerpt
Footnotes


Old New Date Created Author Actions
April 28, 2026 at 10:50 pm Vladimir Betancur Arias
April 21, 2026 at 11:20 pm Tebo Kgosiemang
March 26, 2026 at 4:10 pm Shathani Montsho